將一個Windows程序移植到Linux上發現兩個操作系統對很多數據類型的命名方式區別很大比如Windows下對於無符號數據類型一般用U+x的方式像UINTUCHARULONG而Linux上就要中規中矩都是unsigned +x;另外還有一些數據類型是Windows有而Linux沒有的像DWORDHANDLELPSTR等等於是我寫了一個Windows數據類型在Linux下進行轉換的頭文件
<p>
#define INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE
</p>
<p>
#define _MAX_PATH /* max length of full pathname */
</p>
<p>
#define HANDLE int
</p>
<p>
#define MAX_PATH
</p>
<p>
#define TRUE true
</p>
<p>
#define FALSE false
</p>
<p>
#define __stdcall
</p>
<p>
#define __declspec(x)
</p>
<p>
#define __cdecl
</p>
<p>
#define max(ab) (((a) > (b)) ? (a) : (b))
</p>
<p>
#define min(ab) (((a) < (b)) ? (a) : (b))
</p>
<p>
typedef int BOOL;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned char BYTE;
</p>
<p>
typedef float FLOAT;
</p>
<p>
typedef FLOAT *PFLOAT;
</p>
<p>
typedef char CHAR;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned char UCHAR;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned char *PUCHAR;
</p>
<p>
typedef short SHORT;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned short USHORT;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned short *PUSHORT;
</p>
<p>
typedef long LONG;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned short WORD;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned long DWORD;
</p>
<p>
typedef long long LONGLONG;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned long long ULONGLONG;
</p>
<p>
typedef ULONGLONG *PULONGLONG;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned long ULONG;
</p>
<p>
typedef int INT;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned int UINT;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned int *PUINT;
</p>
<p>
typedef void VOID;
</p>
<p>
typedef char *LPSTR;
</p>
<p>
typedef const char *LPCSTR;
</p>
<p>
typedef wchar_t WCHAR;
</p>
<p>
typedef WCHAR *LPWSTR;
</p>
<p>
typedef const WCHAR *LPCWSTR;
</p>
<p>
typedef DWORD *LPDWORD;
</p>
<p>
typedef unsigned long UINT_PTR;
</p>
<p>
typedef UINT_PTR SIZE_T;
</p>
<p>
typedef LONGLONG USN;
</p>
<p>
typedef BYTE BOOLEAN;
</p>
<p>
typedef void *PVOID;
</p>
<p>
typedef struct _FILETIME {
</p>
<p>
DWORD dwLowDateTime;
</p>
<p>
DWORD dwHighDateTime;
</p>
<p>
} FILETIME;
</p>
<p>
typedef union _ULARGE_INTEGER {
</p>
<p>
struct {
</p>
<p>
DWORD LowPart;
</p>
<p>
DWORD HighPart;
</p>
<p>
};
</p>
<p>
struct {
</p>
<p>
DWORD LowPart;
</p>
<p>
DWORD HighPart;
</p>
<p>
} u;
</p>
<p>
ULONGLONG QuadPart;
</p>
<p>
} ULARGE_INTEGER
</p>
<p>
*PULARGE_INTEGER;
</p>
From:http://tw.wingwit.com/Article/Common/201311/7107.html
